Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 14th Sep 2010 22:42 UTC
Permalink for comment 441183
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-03-17
Where do all these people get the idea that Canonical is obligated to do anything? I've been quite happy with Linux Mint 9 (an Ubuntu derivative, which Canonical receives nothing for), and I just don't get what all the complaining is about.
SO, the don't upstream as much as YOU would like. T.F.S. Get over it. Ubuntu is a DISTRIBUTION - not necessarily a development team. And even if they were only strictly coders whose sole purpose was to submit patches and updates - where (please, tell me) do people get the right to bash them for not performing (for FREE, mind you) up to some petty whining child's expectations..
Its all just so silly.. ..and the pathetic in-fighting doesn't help the reputation of ANY Linux distributions. Remember, we're trying to make a software platform - not a religion.