Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 15th Sep 2010 19:14 UTC
Permalink for comment 441196
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-14
If I can use IE 9, and forget that I'm using IE 9. Then its succesful.
It shouldn't be dramatically slower, dramatically different in its rendering of web pages, or dramatically different in its UI.
I know in the 90's it was job #1 for Microsoft to ensure that browsers would not be compatible with each other, to keep people writing win32 on windows. I think we can safely say they only managed to prevent the inevitable. I see IE 9 as evidence that they've acknowledged and even embraced defeat, which is a very good thing.
I don't really use windows much these days, but when I do, IE is just painful.