Linked by mjhi11 on Thu 16th Sep 2010 20:13 UTC
Permalink for comment 441460
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-10
iTunes isn't part of iLife, but I agree that the iTunes strategy of piping everything through iTunes must be a business decision, because it doesn't make technical sense.
iLife is a different story however. These apps are really well made and are a big showcase of the technologies that OSX use, such as CoreVideo, CoreAudio and CoreAnimation.
This is where Apple shines for the personal user. You can't use them all that well for professional use, but watch a casual user with these apps.
This isn't crapware, but well-engineered software that is built not to be thrown aside after giving up on how to use them and the target audience is quite specific.