Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 14th Sep 2010 22:42 UTC
Permalink for comment 441583
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-09-25
You are confused. They most definitely do not contribute to the linux ecosystem, that's precisely the issue, and people have raised that issue providing hard data. Among different projects canonical doesn't make it anywhere in the list of top contributors, as they amount to around 0.01%. Essentially nothing.
Distributing CDs? You mean distributing Ubuntu CDs? They are distributing their product, it's in their best interest that people use their product.
By reasons you mean excuses? Other companies don't have those "reasons"... don't you find that curious?
First, if Canonical would accept that they don't contribute to the linux community, that would be a first step. Then we could ask the question "why?", but right now they are spinning the issue so that people believe they do contribute, and are part of the team, just like RedHat, Novell, and other companies; that is simply not true.