Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 23rd Sep 2010 21:36 UTC, submitted by google_ninja
Permalink for comment 442431
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-09-10
http://www.vikitech.com/1334/ie9-is-poised-to-be-fastest-browser-am...
(IE9 platform preview #4 is compared to Firefox 3.6.4 and 3.6.8).
Despite what the headline claimed, IE9 is definitely NOT "Poised To Be Fastest Browser Among Firefox 4, Chrome 5 & Safari 5". They didn't even look at Firefox 4.
Your point?
My point is quite simple: if they feel confident about their browser's performance gains, why don't they publish benchmarks comparing code from specific days (dev version of the respective browsers on 31/8, 7/9, 15/9, etc.) The second (related) point is that they could just run it on an independent benchmark like peacekeeper and see how it stacks up to their results... The argument that "everyone does this" (ie. publish benchmarks that measure a single aspect of the browser, the one that compares favourably with others) doesn't make this practice prone to criticism you know...