Linked by vodoomoth on Fri 24th Sep 2010 22:56 UTC
Permalink for comment 442662
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-06-12
As far as I can see the poster says nothing about any version.
For the point I'm trying to get across version numbers are irrelevant; What I'm saying is that since .Net was largely based on Java it will always be closer to Java then any other language since Microsoft has to maintain backward compatibility, it can't change that.
I'm not talking about a higher level features which got added later like closures. Which on the surface make the language/platform appear like language X or Y. I'm talking about the platform as a whole; VM, garbage collection, etc.