Linked by vodoomoth on Mon 27th Sep 2010 13:10 UTC
Permalink for comment 442899
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-08-26
XP "holdouts" might well be very encouraged that Firefox 4 and probably Google Chrome will work with GPU acceleration on XP.
Some certainly will but MS is also sending a strong message which is that they are moving away from XP.
Not that simple because of existing skill sets, productivity rates and features specific to .net.
No IDE is up to par with Visual Studio and there are additional benefits to working exclusively with .net.
Qt still has issues with OSX that need to be resolved but in a few years I think it will provide some good competition.
Are you really suggesting an alternative that doesn't exist yet?
If one simply avoids .NET, and instead uses cross-platform frameworks, these days one can write great cross-platform applications and hence be in a position to sell one's software to a much wider market than just Win 7 and Vista.
Sounds good in theory but you underestimate the amount of work required to target multiple operating systems. There is no "write once, run anywhere" framework but Qt is getting there.