Linked by David Adams on Tue 28th Sep 2010 21:58 UTC
Permalink for comment 443156
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Bingo. Like other poster stated, both Gimp and Photoshop are good on their own rights. As a freelance designer, I mainly use Gimp for budget reason, lower footprint (Adobe CS product are power hungry). While Photoshop is likely complete due to CMYK support for printing, Gimp lack of support can be completed with Krita (thanks to the ability to import xcf and convert into CMYK).
For me, an excellent design can use any software image tool regardless their quirk.