Linked by David Adams on Mon 4th Oct 2010 19:32 UTC, submitted by Idefix
Permalink for comment 443869
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-08-26
He calls OSX "another Unix derivative" which implies that QNX was derived from Unix.
POSIX compatibility in QNX was only added after it was designed as a microkernel, which is far different than the traditional Unix monokernel.
The OS doesn't matter unless you want to run this specific application or hardware or plug-in or.....how did he reach his conclusion again?