Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th Oct 2010 21:32 UTC
Permalink for comment 444433
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
FTA:
I'm not sure why the Linux version of the Flash player can be considered a disaster:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/205575/adobe_unleashes_64bit_beta_fl...
This plugin works just as well on Linux systems as it does anywhere else. It is exactly the same version.
Some Linux browsers don't even require a Flash plugin:
http://www.webmonkey.com/2010/05/new-chrome-beta-gets-a-huge-speed-...
If Microsoft acquires Adobe and pulls the Linux version of the Flash plugin, there are other options for Linux where it may gain an open source Flash player with hardware acceleration:
http://www.phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?t=26235
I'm really struggling to see any problem for Linux here.