Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th Oct 2010 19:10 UTC, submitted by tyrione
Permalink for comment 444485
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
But in terms of compiling the ports they aren't there yet because so many of the ports rely on GNU/GCC'isms that result in compilation fails. Maybe with the rise of a standards compliant compiler we'll see open source developers more attuned to writing their code according to those standards rather than using nasty hacks and work arounds.
Here is a sneak peak as to FreeBSD 9.0 features:
http://ivoras.sharanet.org/freebsd/freebsd9.html
The big thing I'm looking for, along side better hardware support, is tickless kernel support as to improve the over all battery life/power management. What FreeBSD really does need is to remove HAL and provide a native FreeBSD back end to both GNOME and KDE rather than the situation now which is the worst of both worlds and none of the benefits.