Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th Oct 2010 19:10 UTC, submitted by tyrione
Permalink for comment 444658
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-18
I have never seen anything other than software providing this indemnification.
Yep and it's royally fucked up. I expect that law was written in simpler times when there wasn't millions of patents and so many complicated devices. That, or the people who made this law were idiots.
I don't see how you can reasonably expect consumers today to know if a product infringes on a patent. That's just insane.
Yep. Sorry, I usually come to these issues from a non-US standpoint. I'm used to consumers actually having rights.