Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 10th Oct 2005 16:48 UTC, submitted by Shlomi Fish
Permalink for comment 44490
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
---
[ joke ]
Why use C, it's slow and the so high level coding is overkill.
With ASM, you've got simplicity and Speed, and you control exactly what you done with your program.
When you need to pull out every single cycle from your proc, there are no other choices, C is too much bloated
[/ joke ]
That was the typical rant in the 90's against C for gaming on the 68k, i386 processor generation.
Now who cares, coders are waiting the next gen CPU/GPU/PPU/whatever.
Now only the console coders must times to times optimize in asm for a given hardware architecture to "pull out every single cycle from the hardware".
In 20 years, we will have the same arguments between java (wich will be a low level language) and a "yet to define" higher order language.