Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 12th Oct 2010 21:52 UTC
Permalink for comment 445073
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-19
Wow! I thought for as much effort as IBM should be putting into their software, that they'd be better than PeopleSoft. According to my sister, who has to deal with PeopleSoft constantly, it is lacking in fault tolerance and is incredibly slow. Another friend who used to be in the North Dakota college system (whose school signup process is also based on PeopleSoft) said that when time came up to sign up for classes, the software on the server would slow to a crawl.
Is there some intelligent server software anywhere that can cope with loads well when dealing with online record-keeping?