Linked by vivainio on Thu 14th Oct 2010 11:31 UTC
KDE In his lengthy and interesting blog post covering the future of Plasma, KDE's Aaron Seigo proposes Qt Quick and QML (a declarative language that embeds JavaScript) as replacement of the Graphics View architecture currently used by Plasma. This holds a promise of massive speedups and cheap effects as all paint operations become candidates for OpenGL acceleration, contrary to the aging Graphics View architecture that is still stuck with various inefficiencies caused by the underlying QPainter approach. Expressiveness and easy programmability of QML is a nice bonus, of course.
Permalink for comment 445080
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: ...
by TemporalBeing on Thu 14th Oct 2010 18:21 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: ..."
TemporalBeing
Member since:
2007-08-22

The fact that all plasma widgets will have to be migrated to QML eventually or not is a lot of change, a lot of work, alot of testing, a new start over, is like admiting that the things were wrong in the beginning and now have to be corrected, tha impact is not only on the visual side, but also in the python and ruby bindings and if you say is doable it may be, but not w/o a lot of work and testing before. So it feels so frustrating that now may be mandatory to write plasma widgets in QML, and throw away many invested time.


QML is relatively new on the scene. It wasn't available in Qt until Qt 4.6 (released in 2009) - and even then it was an add-on that had to be installed separately, and now it's a native part of Qt as of 4.7 - released right at the end of last month (09/2010).

So to say that it's like admitting that the things were wrong in the beginning and now have to be corrected would be false since it wasn't an option when they started.

In other words, they're trying to evolve the platform as Qt evolves the platform, taking advantage of new features as they become available instead of years afterwards.

That said, I do wonder how the performance of QML will come into play. Even the Qt guys don't recommend it for all things - only things that do not need quick response (e.g. high FPS video players would not be good to do in QML).

Reply Parent Score: 9