Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 18th Oct 2010 16:00 UTC
Permalink for comment 445501
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-12-15
...that's for sure.
For a smart phone, the primary purpose is to be a phone. It's a silly answer because we all know that they're little computers mimicking phones.
Perhaps it's form factor? I think in the long run iPad like devices (including the upcoming andriod/chrome os slates) should be considered "PCs". The iPhone is intended to be a phone. The iPod a intended to be a music player. Sure they have more capability than that, but that is their designed intent. The iPad's designed intent is much broader which in my opinion brings it closer to being a "PC."