Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 19th Oct 2010 12:23 UTC
Permalink for comment 445769
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-10-04
I don't think that kernel is all what's matters in Android. Sure - you can get it like you can get PC linux kernel. But kernel isn't all. And everything else is proprietary. Someone took effort to strip Android from the "everything else" just to see what will left. It was kernel, bluetooth stack and some libraries like libxml. Stack of code from which you can't even make a call. No GUI of course.
Want more? Talk with Google. Used anyway - they will sue you.
So all this talking about "free" and "open" Android is just silly. Sure - you can install apps openly but only if your operator allows it. Some of AT&T phones are stripped from this functionality. And new ones from Verizon will use Verizon store. If Market form Google will be available is in discussion since Verizon phones will be using Bing as default search engine.
And of course you have to make rooting procedure to your device to be a root - ON YOUR OWN PHONE. It's not a problem on many HTC's phones but for example users of Motorola Milestone waited about 8 - 9 months before they could even think about it. Not everything what's is based in some pieces on Open Source is open, free and fair. I think that every one of you could bring some examples.