Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 18th Oct 2010 21:54 UTC
Permalink for comment 445830
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-07-14
The article was garbage.
Waste of my time to look at it.
His argument boils down to "doesn't have windows apps"
Well, I'm sorry that is just BS from the standpoint of 99% of all users.
What Linux lacks is a foot in the door in the supply chain.
Microsoft has all the major OEM in a stranglehold. Also, Microsoft has tried very hard to write its Site licenses so that organizations who need any Microsoft software in bulk have to license it even for machines that don't run it but could.
Linux does not have Superbowl ads or similar publicity.
And lastly, just plain old inertia.
Linux is flat-out better for most of the actual work people buy computers to do, but many of them have been steeped in the microsoft way for so long it is hard for them to understand something different. Yes, switching platforms is hard when you've learned one and spent a long time on it.