Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 19th Oct 2010 12:23 UTC
Permalink for comment 445999
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-02-18
The problem is that Google (and pretty much the rest of the world) mix up "Android" and "Android with Google".
For example, "Android apps" are mostly "Android with Google" apps (because they're available in their market only).
On the other hand, alternative markets aren't really useful for developers because their main audience _is_ in the "with Google" subset of the Android ecosystem.
Everything else is network effects, and so "Android sans Google" could just not exist, from a popularity standpoint.
Personally I'm happy that it is around, as I can reuse their stack for my stuff, but "sans Google" really is irrelevant in the big Android picture.