Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 20th Oct 2010 22:22 UTC, submitted by vivainio
Permalink for comment 446080
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Makes perfect sense. It is hardly a secret that Qt is technically superior to Gtk+. The only reason Linux hasn't more or less standardized on Qt is because of historical reasons. There used to be a lot of confusion and uncertainty about the licensing of Qt, which is why so many apps settled on Gtk instead.
Besides, the differences in look and feel are not that gigantic anymore. The community and also Ubuntu has done a great job integrating both UI toolkits. I bet many people (even Linux people) don't even know VLC, for instance, uses Qt. And as already has been said, KDE is not equal to Qt. KDE merely uses Qt, but Qt is broader.