Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 21st Oct 2010 09:13 UTC
Permalink for comment 446352
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-16
To me, this is akin to an automobile manufacturer telling new car owners which radio stations they can and cannot tune into on their stereos. I'm not a Mac user but as an outsider this seems to be yet another example of Apple controlling how users interact with their own hardware. If one is leasing a computer, I could understand this approach but once you plunk down a considerable chunk of change (versus comparably equipped Wintel machines) then YOU get to decide how you view web content, not Apple. Is it still possible for users to install Flash and Java themselves (easily, without hacks) or is this functionality being culled from MacOS entirely? If the latter is true, then this is outrageous.