Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 20th Oct 2010 22:22 UTC, submitted by vivainio
Permalink for comment 446591
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-05-06
Autodesk are taking Maya all QT, and the company I work at couldn't be sure of the license situation, so felt they had to buy a development license to develop QT Maya UIs. I don't believe they had to, as QT could be used LGPL, and we aren't talking about software that is released, its tools to help internal Maya artists. As it was decided we had to buy development license to use QT, there was the normal BS about do we really need it bought, can't we just not use QT, etc etc. In the end QT is now bought and used, but it was a faff. One that wouldn't have happened if it wasn't dual license. Keep it simple, use one license. Free or not free, no if's or but's.