Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 20th Oct 2010 22:22 UTC, submitted by vivainio
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu This is kind of... Well, good news, I suppose? It depends on where you allegiances lie, but it seems like Ubuntu is warming up to the idea of using Qt to develop applications. It's no secret that Qt is a far more advanced development framework than Gtk+, so it only makes sense for Ubuntu - a GNOME/Gtk+ distribution - is looking at it.
Permalink for comment 446849
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: I don't like dual lience.
by phoenix on Sun 24th Oct 2010 18:52 UTC in reply to "I don't like dual lience."
phoenix
Member since:
2005-07-11

Is it really so hard to understand?

If you use QT to create an app that you sell, then you need the commercial QT license.

If you use QT to create apps that are only used internally (never distributed outside the company, never sold to anyone, etc), then you use the LGPL license.

If you use QT to create an app that you give away, you use the LGPL license.

Edited 2010-10-24 18:53 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2