Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 23rd Oct 2010 22:23 UTC
Windows "Windows 7 might be a massive commercial success and an undeniably rock solid piece of software, but Microsoft is apparently unwilling to rest on those soft and cozy laurels. Asked about the riskiest product bet the Redmond crew is currently developing, its fearless leader Steve Ballmer took no time in answering 'the next release of Windows'." Also of note in this same video interview thing: Ballmer states that Silverlight is now pretty much strictly a client, non-cross platform thing, while explicitly stating that when it comes to doing something universal, "the world's gone HTML5".
Permalink for comment 446970
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Risky?
by Panajev on Mon 25th Oct 2010 16:10 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Risky?"
Panajev
Member since:
2008-01-09

A good example of all of this seamless transition is the one MS made from Win 98/Me to XP. They were completely different code bases, different kernels,ect. But, no one could really deny form day 1 that XP was infinitely better than win me/98.


In several workplaces, many people preferred to stay with Windows 2000, the XP uptake was slow there... almost Vista slow.

One of the biggest advantages XP had over Vista in overcoming its predecessor was that XP SP3 was not nearly as crappy as Windows ME was compared to its successor.

I remember XP having some HW issues, such as it not booting without unplugging a USB keyboard I had... not until it finished the installation and got some more patches.

Reply Parent Score: 2