Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Oct 2010 20:07 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Permalink for comment 447575
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
GPL allows anyone to study the code, and to use it internally. Only-redistribution of the GPL code invokes the conditions within the GPL, permission to do anything else is granted unconditionally.
I would presume this means that it is perfectly permissible to de-compile GPL code, and then re-implement it so that the re-implementation is not a copy of the original.
Names of API entry points and the like are not protectable under copyright law, for reasons of interoperability.
You could end up with very similar-looking code that was not a violation of copyright, given the provisions of the GPL license.
Edited 2010-10-29 02:26 UTC