Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Oct 2010 20:07 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Legal Now, this is an interesting development in the ongoing war against Android. Oracle didn't just sue Google for allegedly infringing its Java patents; it also claimed copyright infringement. Oracle has amended its complaint, and, fair is fair, they've got the code to prove it: indeed, Android contains code that appears to be copied verbatim from Java - mind you, appears. However, the code in question comes straight from Apache's Harmony project, which raises the question - would a respected and long-established cornerstone of the open source world really accept tainted code in the first place?
Permalink for comment 447614
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: But what about GPL?
by Timmmm on Fri 29th Oct 2010 10:16 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: But what about GPL?"
Member since:

GPL allows for de-compiling and for re-implementation. In fact, it encourages it.

De-compilation, yes. But redistribution of your decompilation under a different licence? Of course not.

Reply Parent Score: 2