Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Oct 2010 18:02 UTC, submitted by viator
Permalink for comment 447850
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-06-09
"Microsoft is asking a company to pay for a license to Microsoft patents which the company's products do not embody?"
You have no evidence that Android contains no Microsoft patented technology. Your comment is purely speculation.
"Why am I not surprised?"
It is easy for you to jump to conclusions it seems. A common artifact of a paranoid delusion.
"BTW, it occurs to me to ponder ... why would anybody who is not working for Microsoft's interests, on a topic where someone started out by claiming that "they are no fan of Microsoft", be afraid to give us their opinion on that point?"
What could possibly be holding you back, fewt?"
Oh, I see. So I get a paycheck from Microsoft too, huh. I hadn't given an opinion because I don't have all of the facts. What I do know though is that you don't have all of the facts either, yet here you are pretending that you do. If Microsoft has patents on technology in Android, Microsoft has a right to royalties on device sales within countries where patent laws allow it. This is the law, even if you don't like it. These various vendors are free to take Microsoft to court if they believe that Microsoft is wrong.