Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 31st Oct 2010 22:13 UTC, submitted by Michael
KDE Ambition. Too little, and you stagnate. Too much, and you end up stumbling. Keep this in mind. KDE4 was, and is, a very brave and ambitious effort, and while in my personal opinion they've still got a long way to go, especially in the performance department (I regained some hope lately), they're getting there. Imagine my surprise that after the recently announced overhaul of Plasma, a rather wild idea has popped up that would mean Qt5 and KDE5 - assuming the idea gets enough support, of course.
Permalink for comment 447954
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
shaunehunter
Member since:
2007-02-12

I always kind of assumed this was the direction they were heading in with the release of KDE4/QT4. Given Trolltech and then Nokia's employees always heavy involvement in KDE's development it just seemed logical. It's seems that the KDE is disorganized and a concrete direction to a goal like this needs to be stated otherwise KDE4 will just float around forever and stagnate like GNOME2 has.

With the acquisition of QT by Nokia, KDE has been sitting in a potentially explosive position for a couple years now and it seems to continue to be loaded with more powder every day. Currently the largest mobile phone and microchip manufacturers (Nokia and Intel) are unsuccessfully scrambling to create in Meego what KDE almost already is (and so much more). Now Ubuntu, the largest desktop Linux distro, want's to switch to QT.

If this merger happens it means that every KDE app will be available on Windows and Mac OS's as well as almost half the worlds mobile phones by default (Amarok could be a potent gateway drug). No opportunity for the adoption of linux by end users of this scale has ever been presented before. It's been my opinion that the KDE people have been severly neglecting platform promotion.

With some sales savvy and a clear workable proposal I think these three parties could be brought on board to do something really special.

I also think that the KDE4/QT4 Social Semantic Desktop idea is a better fit for a Unity/GNOME Shell type interface than GNOME/Gtk or even KDE's current one.

To end with a random thought, KDE's biggest criticism is the KDElibs dependancies on thier apps. I guess people don't realise that they're under 15MB in total.

Reply Score: 3