Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 1st Nov 2010 17:10 UTC
Permalink for comment 448122
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-06-09
Ergo, Apple, as distributor, is violating the GPL.
This is GPL 101.
Oh, I am embarrassing myself now am I? The only embarrassment here is you Thom. Your lack of professionalism, and your inability to admit when you are wrong is pathetic. You clearly lack any understanding of the GPL v2, as evidenced by your inability to respond to even one of my replies to your nonsense with any facts to support your argument. Like the comment just now about how evil Apple is restricting your rights, no where in the GPL v2 does it state that you have unlimited rights, you only have the rights as defined in the GNU GPL v2 which is why it was necessary to create the GPL v3. You just keep making the same claim over and over though like a broken record somehow expecting a different result.
To quote Albert Einstein; "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. "
Resorting to personal attacks as you have now done just makes you look even more a fool. I left OSNews years ago because the leading writer at the time was bat-shit crazy. I guess nothing has changed, and it is still more important for OSNews to get hits than it is to be credible.
Educate yourself: http://gplv3.fsf.org/rms-why.html
Edited 2010-11-02 01:05 UTC