Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 6th Nov 2010 00:27 UTC
Permalink for comment 448869
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-11-19
You're trolling, please develop? In the consumer market, MS has the largest footprint by far, making them the prime target for any security expert. Over the years they developped alot of inherent security mechanisms in the system while mounting what is probably one of the best threat-response workflow of every desktop OS company. They were bad years ago but please provide substantial results on why they didn't improve in the recent years?
Sure, they're not OpenBSD, but their market is quite different and has different needs. I'm all for a good MS bashing but security since vista/7 has improved by leaps. After that, it's not really their fault people are stupid, dl random exe from porn sites, disable UAC and the likes.