Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 10th Nov 2010 23:31 UTC
Permalink for comment 449698
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-10-13
Totally agree. The fact that a politician had that degree of insight at all is noteworthy; however, her speech greatly oversimplified a complex industry, and her arguments were supported mostly by idealism instead of hard facts about the alleged negative economic impact caused by the current copyright system.
Furthermore, you can sense the latent anti-corporation, socialist tendencies driving her view, which is not surprising for a French politician. How exactly does her proposal ensure artists' works are protected and that they are paid fairly? Who exactly will run this one, single entity? A big, bureaucratic EU agency of course, staffed with employees with 30-hour work weeks.