Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 11th Nov 2010 22:36 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Permalink for comment 449727
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-11-29
80% are available in WebM (as the article notes) but only a tiny fraction of the videos served daily are served in that format.
(Nothing against WebM. It's a great standard and a great effort by Google but it's still really in it's infancy.)
The "served" part you added yourself. There is nothing wrong with the text "80% of Daily YouTube Videos Now in WebM". It is correct to the letter. If Video "Monkey gets shaved" is served today in flash, and is now available in WebM you CAN say "the video 'Monkey gets shaved', now in WebM", because now it is also available in WebM. There is nothing far fetched about it. The title indeed isn't specific on being about "being served" or "being available" or "of those being served these many are available" but you can easily find out. Would have been a bit too much description in the title, wouldn't you think?
A little annoyed by the excessive nit-picking. I understood the title just fine on first read.