Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 12th Nov 2010 22:35 UTC, submitted by Debjit
Permalink for comment 449898
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-10-17
I wasn't referring to what platform by requesting "Please define X?", I was referring to what X as in what layer... X proper the spec? X with DRI extension? Xorg the server? XFree86 the server, etc.?
I agree in the sense that GDE and KDE are competing and reinventing the wheel. There is so much potential there if they weren't writing 2 calculators, 2 notepads, etc.
I think Wayland is different in the sense that the Vista/7 DWM is different as opposed to XP's windowing system while still supporting XP-coded clients. It's a successor, not a competitor.
I think that if Wayland succeeds, Xorg will be considered old hat on GNU/Linux systems. Maybe not additional *NIX that have different kernel capabilities, but certainly on Linux.
What say you?