Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 22nd Nov 2010 19:55 UTC, submitted by Michael
Permalink for comment 450929
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-11
From the Phoronix article:
One of the main features of ZFS is storage pooling, and getting rid of all the hassles of managing multiple disks. Testing it on a single disk without testing it on multiple disks is pretty much pointless.
Sure, some people run it on their laptops with a single disk, to get access to all the snapshots and checksumming. But that's an edge use-case, not the primary one.
Sometimes, I think Phoronix just "benchmarks" random things, throws them up on the 'net, and waits to see what sticks. There's really no statistical methodology in place.
On the flip-side, the race is now on to see who gets ZFSv28 first: FreeBSD 9.0 or Ubuntu 10.04 LTS (and whatever other distros KQI supports)
There are ZFSv28 patches available for 9-CURRENT right now, but nothing committed to the source tree as yet. And the Linux kernel is in "limited beta". Both with a release date of "early 2011".