Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 22nd Nov 2010 19:53 UTC
Permalink for comment 450932
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-05-06
Big difference is that Linux is not written acording to MSFT specs like Mono. Mono is unlicensed reimplementation of Microsoft .NET. A clone of proprietary tech, and every Mono user expects that Microsoft is king of .NET and by extension, Mono. Most Mono devs are Microsoft fanboys anyways. So what Microsoft says about Mono is important.
Not so about GNU/Linux. They have no right to talk about GNU/Linux. Whenever they say something about it, they are full of crap.