Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 22nd Nov 2010 19:53 UTC
Permalink for comment 451105
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-05-06
It would be very stupid of Microsoft to prevent you from using Mono now, when nothing of importance depend on it. What would they gain? They would just ruin their carefully set up trap and make no damage in the process.
They are still in the bait faze, switch comes later whem de Icaza realize his dream to base GNOME 4.0 on Mono. When entire user experience depends on Mono. That is they aim of Team Apologista and Microsoft astroturfers all over the internet. Read "Evangelism is War" sometimes. Also you could read this to see how Microsoft operates and how they think of "open source"
http://www.the-source.com/open-source-at-microsoft/
If we all do the right thing and don't take the bait, "switch" phase will simply never come. Mono will simply fail to get critical mass needed to do any serious damage, and Microsoft will give up; they would go to set up another trap. You would probably say "I told you so, they wont sue" but I wouldn't mind as long as threat is removed.
What I would hate is seeing situating when we were right like this time, when Novell's sells its patents to Microsoft. Practically last Novell's move before it's death is another treason. That reassures we were right all along but I am not liking it. It sucks to be right sometimes.
Edited 2010-11-25 10:02 UTC