Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 27th Nov 2010 10:46 UTC
Permalink for comment 451330
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Thom, the statement I'm referring to was, "It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realise that a government institution issuing fines for profanities on broadcasting networks is a direct violation of this First Amendment."
http://www.osnews.com/story/23739/FCC_Illustrates_Its_Inability_to_...
Depending on the circumstances, profanities can be interpreted as "obscenity"; therefore, they aren't always protected under the first amendment.
http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/analysis.aspx?id=18508
Notice that the FCC's regulation of profanities was a consequence of a judgment by the US Supreme Court, in keeping with a very long history of how to interpret the First Amendment. Your comments were at best misinformed.
Again, the point isn't whether I agree with you in the circumstances that inflamed you; the point is that you were making grand legal pronouncements without knowing what you were talking about. That may be highly self-gratifying and it may get you a lot of high-fives from the small crowd who agree with you, but it's not responsible journalism, and most people who have thought about this will roll their eyes.
So, again: go look up what a "seizure warrant" is; go look up what "probable cause" means. Only then can we have an intelligent conversation about "guilty until proven otherwise".