Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 24th Nov 2010 23:06 UTC
OpenStep, GNUstep I don't really know what Sony wants with this, but they're using GNUstep, so that's something, I guess. "Sony's Networked Application Platform is a project designed to leverage the open source community to build and evolve the next generation application framework for consumer electronic devices. The developer program gives access to a developer community and resources like SDK, tools, documentation and other developers. The foundation upon which this project is base comes from the GNUstep community, whose origin dates back to the OpenStep standard developed by NeXT Computer Inc (now Apple Computer Inc.). While Apple has continued to update their specification in the form of Cocoa and Mac OS X, the GNUstep branch of the tree has diverged considerably."
Permalink for comment 451359
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Objective -C / C++
by Morgan on Sat 27th Nov 2010 20:32 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: Objective -C / C++ "
Member since:

This is a discussion almost as old as the war between Windows and MacOS. Growing up using both in the 80s, I can say first hand that besides being a matter of preference, it also goes to experience. Specifically, if one has only ever known the Windows way of per-window menu bars, they will be frustrated and confused by the global menu bar scheme. Conversely, a lifelong Mac user finds it annoying to constantly have to hunt down the elusive menu bar.

I won't say one is better than the other, though I will say a global menu bar makes a lot of sense to me. It keeps the bar in the exact same place no matter what app you're in (think muscle memory), and makes good use of what would otherwise be a lot of wasted space. But, I'm comfortable with both as I've used every major and a lot of minor GUIs in my life. I'm most comfortable in OS X these days, but as I don't own a Mac at the moment I'm using Windows 7 and I'm getting by just fine with per-window menu bars (among other differences).

Reply Parent Score: 2