Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 28th Nov 2010 23:22 UTC
Legal We've had a bit of a copyrightesque weekend here on OSNews, so it seems only fitting to end this Sunday with yet another story on this subject. This one isn't so much anger-inducing as much as it is what?-inducing - you'll either laugh or cry. It basically comes down to this: a smart lawyer is selling self-help packages to aid victims of the mass-P2P lawsuits in the US, and now the media companies behind those lawsuits are suing this lawyer... For causing them damage.
Permalink for comment 451515
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

Show us. I am very curious to see some stats about how many have been filed and what the resulting rulings on them have been.

From TFA:

Although all the motions to quash and motions for protective order, whether filed by an attorney or filed by a pro se defendant, have been denied repeatedly by the judges, the motions to dismiss have not.

Defendants who filed a motion to dismiss for a lack of personal jurisdiction have been successful.

So we have one person saying they're working (though is vague whether the pro se motions to dismiss have been successful), and another, you, saying they aren't. Whom am I to believe without evidence?

Reply Parent Score: 2