Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 27th Nov 2010 10:46 UTC
Permalink for comment 451538
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
But run a bittorrent search on the same domain? Now THAT's over the line.
Have you not noticed the reduction in spam. "
Honestly, no, I hadn't noticed any decrease in spam. If anything, I've seen increase in some types of spam - E.g. spam targeting EMail-to-SMS gateways & manual spamming of contact forms (to get around CAPTCHAs).
That's certainly good to hear, any online sources with details (I couldn't find any mentions with some quick googling)?
Yes. Domains play more of a "support" role in the spam world these days (hosting the sites linked to by spam).
This is just the next step in the anti-spam process.
All the illegal usage of bittorrent could not go on for ever.
If the underlying goal of these seizures is to combat spam, then it seems a needlessly round-about way of doing it (as opposed to, say, fixing CAN-SPAM). But judging from the list of seized domain names, the main targets seem to be knock-off/counterfeit consumer goods.