Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 2nd Dec 2010 23:20 UTC
Permalink for comment 452122
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-12-05
That does work (I used that method to save SWF games and cartoons and stuff), but like you said it is annoying.
My preference for Flash videos is actually to use the Firefox extension Video DownloadHelper to save a version of the video in a standard MPEG-4 container to watch offline. It makes saving embedded Flash video files easy. YouTube has plain .mp4 versions of most of their videos, and I'll take those over Flash files--I want to avoid anything Flash if possible, I'll take a "proper" video format any day. Of course, the .flv files can be saved as well if a particular video (or site) has no .mp4 version.
It's become more annoying lately (&fmt=18 has to manually be added to the URL for the MP4 file to be shown if it is available), but luckily it still works. And all 720p/1080p videos seem to be MP4 files by default.
It sure is nice being able to save these videos for later use; who knows if YouTube will decide to delete them, and while I have cable, its max speed is 80-90KB/s (yeah, cheap service, regular costs like $30 more per month). And not everyone has access to the Internet--being able to put them on a DVD or USB flash memory stick to watch on any MPEG-4-capable video player is very useful. It's a breach of service I'm sure, but oh well--if they don't want the videos to be seen, then they shouldn't be hosting them for the public to see on the Internet.
Edited 2010-12-04 01:03 UTC