Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 8th Dec 2010 12:16 UTC
Permalink for comment 452929
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 11:39 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 11:32 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 19:39 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 11:43 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-04
See the UPDATE to this story, here: http://techcrunch.com/2010/12/08/paypal-wikileaks/
The original story was that the US State Dept wrote a letter to PayPal saying that the State Dept deemed Wikileaks to be engaging in illegal activity, and therefore PayPal suspended Wikileaks' PayPal account.
But no, it turns out that the State Dept wrote a letter to Wikileaks, saying that they deemed that Wikileaks was engaged in illegalities, and based on that letter from the State Dept to Wikileaks (not from the State Dept to PayPal), PayPal decided to suspend Wikileaks' PayPal account. The US State Dept made no contact with PayPal.
I await Thom's update to his summary of events according to PayPal's clarification.
Edited 2010-12-09 08:19 UTC