Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 8th Dec 2010 12:16 UTC
Permalink for comment 453184
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-04
You might be just joking, but I'll answer the question anyway.
I don't know if "foreigners" is a protected class in the US. But even if it were, it's not the case that one is required to do business with all members of protected classes, it's that one cannot refuse to do business with someone just because they are a member of a protected class. One can still refuse to do business with that person for other reasons.
For example, PayPal couldn't refuse to do business with someone on the basis of that person's being Latino (for example), but could refuse to do business with that person for suspected criminality, or violation of PayPal's terms of service, etc.
PayPal is within their rights not to do business with Assange as long as the reason for such refusal is not related to Assange's membership in a protected class.
Note that I don't speak of PayPal's freezing of Wikileak's PayPal account. Apparently PayPal has released those funds to Wikileaks, but now that tha's done, PayPal doesn't have to conduct further transactions involving Assange or Wikileaks.