Linked by Adurbe on Sun 12th Dec 2010 21:55 UTC
Internet & Networking For a number of days the websites of MasterCard, Visa, PayPal and others wre attacked by a group of WikiLeaks supporters ('hacktivists'). Although the group calls itself 'Anonymous', researchers at the DACS group of the University of Twente (UT), the Netherlands, discovered that these hacktivists are easily traceable, and therefore anything but anonymous.
Permalink for comment 453338
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Well...
by Bounty on Mon 13th Dec 2010 17:39 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Well..."
Bounty
Member since:
2006-09-18

In the US, it leads to the absolutely retarded situation of WikiLeaks being banned from financial institutions, while at the same time, these institutions have no problems carrying the funds of organisations like the KKK. The only reason these institutions are now banning WikiLeaks is because they are afraid of possible bad press. That's exactly the kind of willy-nilly behaviour financial institutions should not be allowed to display.


Problem is KKK are not the ones making major news right now. If they did, I'd guess PayPal would get pressured to act. I think PayPal tend to act on a "serve everyone until someone complains loud enough" strategy. Which is how most businesses work. Basically damage control. If you bring up your KKK point loudly (gets media attention) enough, they'll probably act. I would support you if you did.

Also, I don't think I agree with your other points. Why shouldn't PayPal be allowed to stop doing business with the KKK for example, if they start getting bad press over it? Sure the KKK would have to find another financial institution to work with, but I don't see why PayPal should be compeled to work with them.

(spelling)

Edited 2010-12-13 17:41 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2