Linked by Adurbe on Sun 12th Dec 2010 21:55 UTC
Permalink for comment 453338
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-09-18
Problem is KKK are not the ones making major news right now. If they did, I'd guess PayPal would get pressured to act. I think PayPal tend to act on a "serve everyone until someone complains loud enough" strategy. Which is how most businesses work. Basically damage control. If you bring up your KKK point loudly (gets media attention) enough, they'll probably act. I would support you if you did.
Also, I don't think I agree with your other points. Why shouldn't PayPal be allowed to stop doing business with the KKK for example, if they start getting bad press over it? Sure the KKK would have to find another financial institution to work with, but I don't see why PayPal should be compeled to work with them.
(spelling)
Edited 2010-12-13 17:41 UTC