Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 13th Dec 2010 19:27 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Permalink for comment 453370
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
Samba has specifications supplied by Microsoft, and the SMB protocol itself is originally an IBM invention.
Any patent on FAT itself has long expired by now.
FAT and Samba are both "interoperability" functionality, and in many cases that would mean that other implementations are permitted by law - anti lock-in laws if you like.
.NET has none of these considerations.
Thankfully, Mono-based applications on Linux are simply not required. One can easily replace all of the Mono-based applications for Linux, and not miss a single thing.