Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 13th Dec 2010 19:27 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Mono Project For the most time, I've been firmly in the largest camp when it comes to the Mono debate - the 'I don't care'-camp. With patent lawsuits being hotter than Lady Gaga right now, that changed. For good reason, so it seems; while firmly in the 'ZOMG-MICROSOFT-IS-T3H-EVILL!1!!ONE!'-camp, The-Source.com investigated the five most popular Mono applications, and the conclusion is clear: all of them implement a lot of namespaces which are not covered by Microsoft's community promise thing.
Permalink for comment 453402
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Evil Companies
by Delgarde on Tue 14th Dec 2010 02:34 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: Evil Companies"
Delgarde
Member since:
2008-08-19

Most people who speak of an IDE wouldn't include Emacs or VIM + *insert extension(s)* in the class of "IDE".
They usually mean "Approachable GUI IDE".


Pretty sure "approachable GUI IDE" is an oxymoron... I've used a few IDEs over the years, and those capable enough to be worth using tend to have a huge learning curve. Excellent for a developer willing to take time to learn his tools, but very tricky to start with - particularly if coming from the "vi + terminal" school of development.

Reply Parent Score: 4