Linked by Howard Fosdick on Mon 13th Dec 2010 23:11 UTC
Permalink for comment 453476
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-08-18
Sharepoint we can get support for, we cannot get adequate support for OpenSource alternatives.
There are plenty of Microsoft Certified Partners which we can find support contracts with ... so we have plenty of choice.
Also because we are a charity, Microsoft and Google give us a significant discount (90%+) on their software (and in google's case Hardware).
Again, we must have a support contract. We cannot find anyone to support us.
We do not have the resources in house to support it.
For example we use Oracle, SQL Server 2005/2008, Windows Server 2003 R2 and IIS, our current Admins do not have any know say PostgresSQL (MySQL does not have any GIS capabilities), Apache and Linux.
Using LAPP stack will be most likely be more costly since we have to migrate our current software and skillset over. This cost is minute compared to the licensing costs from Microsoft.
[sarcasm]Yes we can just write our own, because writing software is so simple.[/sarcasm]
When I did work for a software house, MIT/BSD licenses were acceptable and any license where we didn't have to "give the code back".
This is because if we did make any modifications e.g. bug fixes, and deployed to a live site we are required by the GPL to give the code back. This is of course simply unacceptable, to our management thus no GPL software.
GPL isn't a one size fits all solution. I wish you would stop pretending it is.