Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 16th Dec 2010 21:57 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Permalink for comment 453932
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-05-19
It can and has paid for the lawyers.
This company just tried (and probably will, considering the level of corruption in the US patent system) to patent 'shareable apps'.
Considering the visual they presented, it consists of paying for something (is the exchange of money really a neccessary step here?) downloading a program, sending it via a third party to another person, who can do the same, and at some point someone else pays for something... That's called... the Internet.
_that's_ an offensive action, because I'm offended.