Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 23rd Dec 2010 19:19 UTC
Permalink for comment 454622
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-11-19
Currently servers is the only place Microsoft can comfortably try new things. Most of their stuff is based on .Net, which is portable anyways, and the NT kernel has always been multi-platfrom capable.
And, if they succeed, I believe, like others mentioned above, this will pave roads for a future Chrome OS competitor in smaller devices. If they can make sure that Windows runs OK on ARM, then they can have a small shell/IE/Silverlight/RDP services for their lightweight clients.