Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 23rd Dec 2010 19:19 UTC
Permalink for comment 454654
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-14
Ok, that makes more sense. But within the same processor architecture, its pretty easy to just guess that this years x86 processor is probably going to handle the load that last years did. Changing architectures means you have a lot less in common and requires much more intensive resource planing.
Virtualization, in my opinion is a good argument why ARM will never take off in the data center. If you have a lot of underused servers, virtualization is awesome. A much better solution for high availability, backup, and energy conservation than ARM.